Essential tax considerations for your U.S. launch

Feb 18, 2026

5 minutes

Article_Jacob_U.S._Subsidiary_Setup
Too many times non U.S.-companies think they can conduct business in the U.S. without establishing a tax presence with that foreign entity in the U.S. In the meantime, they handle their U.S. payroll via a 'global PEO or EOR', have agents in the U.S., or use Incoterms that create various forms of tax presence at the federal and state levels. They also underestimate the legal exposure this creates, which their regular insurance often doesn't cover. Until recently this often stayed under the radar with the authorities and only became an issue during a proper due diligence in a round of fundraising or exit.  
 
Given the rise of E-commerce and the intelligence now available to federal and state authorities, more companies realize they should better prepare and limit the legal and tax exposure of their foreign entity by establishing a U.S. subsidiary. The next question for those companies is whether a Delaware entity provides sufficient coverage. While legally accurate for corporate structure, a simple "yes" masks an ongoing financial responsibility.
 
In this article TABS Founder and President Jacob Willemsen breaks down the essential tax considerations for U.S. expansion.
 
Standard legal incorporation addresses the corporate framework and tax matters on a federal level, but frequently neglects the complexities of the 50-state tax system. Many companies focus exclusively on legal requirements, inadvertently triggering substantial state and local tax obligations. Without a proactive approach, these overlooked requirements can place a U.S. expansion on a precarious financial foundation.

The limitation of the "Delaware-only" strategy

Executives accustomed to streamlined national tax systems in Europe often seek similar simplicity in the U.S. market. However, a legal entity in Delaware is entirely separate from the state and local tax (SALT) obligations triggered by a company’s sales, marketing, HR activities, office locations, warehousing, assets etc. across the country. 

 

Crucially, this risk is not confined to the U.S. subsidiary. European HQs, can trigger U.S. tax obligations the moment they begin transacting with U.S. customers from overseas. States do not require a company to be "incorporated" within their borders to demand tax compliance; they only require a "Nexus.", and this nexus often gets triggered without management in Europe realizing it.

Identifying the tax trigger: Nexus

"Nexus" refers to a physical or economic tie to a state that creates a tax obligation. Since the 2018 Supreme Court ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair, physical presence is no longer the sole requirement for a presence for Sales and Use Tax (SUT). Increasingly, states argue that companies that need to register for SUT may also have a nexus for Corporate Income Tax (CIT). 

There are two primary categories of Nexus that international companies must manage: 
Physical Nexus: This is mostly triggered by having property, inventory, or personnel in a state. For new market entrants, the most common trigger is hiring a single (remote) employee. Placing one salesperson in a U.S. state instantly creates a physical presence, making the foreign entity liable for corporate income tax, franchise tax, or local business taxes in that jurisdiction for as long as the salesperson is employed.
Economic Nexus: This is an invisible tripwire for companies. Most states mandate SUT registration, collection (where applicable) and periodic filing and remittance once a company exceeds specific sales thresholds, often as low as $100,000 or 200 transactions. Exceeding these limits might create immediate state tax obligations, regardless of whether a company has a physical presence in that state.

Distinguishing U.S. sales tax from European VAT

One of the most significant hurdles for international founders is assuming that U.S. Sales and Use Tax (SUT) mirrors the European VAT system. In reality, they operate on entirely different principles: 
Fragmentation of Rules: Unlike the uniform VAT systems in Europe, rules for whether a transaction is taxable vary wildly by state. For instance, SaaS is subject to SUT in a growing majority of states, but not yet all.
The "End-User" Concept: The biggest distinction is that VAT applies to every transaction in the supply chain, allowing companies to claim credits for VAT paid against VAT collected. SUT does not offer this "credit" system.
The Consumer Status: In the eyes of U.S. tax authorities, the company is often considered the "end-user" or "consumer" of the products and software it buys to run its business, making that tax a final cost rather than a pass-through.
Goods vs. Services: While VAT applies to almost every transaction-whether goods or services-most U.S. states still do not subject professional services to SUT, focusing primarily on "tangible personal property" and specific digital products.

The risks of relying solely on PEOs

A common trend among European companies is the use of Professional Employer Organizations (PEOs) or Employers of Record (EOR’s) to manage U.S. hiring. While the EORs may simplify payroll matters, they do not insulate a company from Corporate Income Tax (CIT) and SUT exposure.  

 

The employee remains an agent of the foreign holding company. Consequently, their activities often create Nexus, exposing the international entity to U.S. corporate and sales tax risks. To mitigate this, established firms should utilize a local U.S. subsidiary to "fence off" these liabilities, ensuring the European parent company remains protected from federal and state-level reach. 

 

While the IRS, and an increasing number of states, have upped their way of getting overseas companies on their radar to argue tax presence for the European entity, it is still mostly in the due diligence stage when the company is trying to raise funds or do a (US) exit that these tax exposures come to the surface.  

Conclusion: Strategic compliance as a growth lever

Multi-state tax compliance is not an optional legal hurdle, but an ongoing operational responsibility that evolves as a company scales. Managing these obligations requires tracking every expansion milestone-such as a first remote hire or crossing a specific state revenue threshold-to ensure tax filings remain current. 

For international companies, the goal is to isolate these risks within a dedicated U.S. structure to protect the parent company from state-level tax exposure. By partnering with an integrated back-office specialist, executives can ensure that U.S. tax and governance requirements are managed professionally, allowing the leadership team to focus on commercial growth with a stable, compliant foundation. 

Ready to build your compliant growth strategy? Reach out to TABS to schedule a focused discussion and a preliminary compliance risk assessment. 

About the author

Jacob Willemsen is the Founder and President of TABS Inc., a company he started in 2010 to simplify the complex U.S. "back office" for European businessesJacob's expertise is rooted in decades of firsthand experience in U.S.-European international trade. His inhouse international team have since guided over 3,000 companies through their transatlantic setup, allowing them to focus entirely on their U.S. business development and growth. 
Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal, tax, or accounting advice. To evaluate your specific situation and ensure full compliance, contact TABS today. We will assess your equity plan, handle all operational execution, and connect you with the appropriate specialized U.S. tax attorneys and CPAs within our trusted network.

Explore more insights

Related articles you might find useful
Market Entry
kooboo_2_april_(1)

Planning U.S. Growth Without a Billion-Dollar Buffer?

Jul 11, 2025
By Cameron Heffernan
Succeeding in the U.S. market without a massive safety net requires precision. Discover the 5 essential pillars mid-sized companies need to protect their investment and ensure every decision pays off.
Read Article
4 minutes
HR & Payroll
HR_CalSavers

U.S. Payroll & CalSavers:
Compliance Risk for Foreign Companies

Feb 28, 2026
By Aaron Mongerson
Avoid costly CalSavers penalties. Learn why European companies need U.S. payroll experts for mandatory retirement compliance and a strong U.S. presence.
Read Article
3 minutes